7440-61-1JFALSRSLKYAFGM-UHFFFAOYSA-NJFALSRSLKYAFGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N
UraniumUranium, isotope of mass 238
238U Element
UN 2979 (DOT)
Uranium I
DTXSID10425227440-43-9BDOSMKKIYDKNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-NBDOSMKKIYDKNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
CadmiumCadimium
CADMIUM BLUE
CADMIUM, IN PLATTEN, STANGEN, BROCKEN,KOERNER
DTXSID1023940GO:0005739mitochondrionCHEBI:16991deoxyribonucleic acidCHEBI:26523reactive oxygen speciesGO:0009058biosynthetic process7functional change1increasedUranium2021-08-05T14:28:502021-08-05T14:28:50Nanoparticles and Micrometer Particles2022-02-04T13:43:432022-02-04T13:43:43Cadmium2017-10-25T08:33:122017-10-25T08:33:12Ionizing Radiation<p>Ionizing radiation can vary in energy, dose, charge, and in the spatial distributions of energy transferred to other matter (linear energy transfer per unit length or LET) (ICRU 1970). At the same dose, low and high LET both generate energy deposition events, including many higher energy events (Goodhead and Nikjoo 1989). However, they differ in the spatial distribution and upper range of intensity of energy deposited. Lower LET such as gamma rays sparsely deposit many individual excitations or small clusters of excitations of low energy (Goodhead 1988). In contrast, high LET such as alpha particles have fewer tracks but readily transfer their energy to matter and therefore deposit their energy over a much smaller area (Goodhead 1994). Consequently, alpha and other high LET particles penetrate less deeply into tissue, interactions are densely focused on a narrow track, and individual energy depositions can be large (Goodhead 1988). These different energy deposition patterns can lead to differences in radiation effects including the pattern of DNA damage.</p>
<p>Exposure to ionizing radiation can come from natural and industrial sources. Space and terrestrial radiation includes a range of LET particles, while diagnostic radiation methods such as X-ray imaging, mammography and CT scans use low LET X-rays. Radiation therapy can use an external beam to direct radiation on a focused tissue area, or deposit solid or liquid radioactive materials in the body that release (mostly gamma) radiation internally. External radiotherapy typically uses X-rays but is moving towards higher LET charged particles such as protons and heavy ions (Durante, Orecchia et al. 2017).</p>
2019-05-03T12:36:362019-05-07T12:12:13Estrogen2019-05-08T11:40:272019-05-08T11:40:27WCS_9606human10090mouse10116ratActivation, PARP1PARP1 Molecular2022-07-18T05:23:362022-07-18T05:23:36Releasing, Apoptosis-Inducing Factor (AIF)AIF releaseMolecular2022-07-18T05:25:562022-07-18T05:25:56N/A, Mitochondrial dysfunction 1N/A, Mitochondrial dysfunction 1Cellular<p>Mitochondrial dysfunction is a consequence of inhibition of the respiratory chain leading to oxidative stress.</p>
<p>Mitochondria can be found in all cells and are considered the most important cellular consumers of oxygen. Furthermore, mitochondria possess numerous redox enzymes capable of transferring single electrons to oxygen, generating the superoxide (O2-). Some mitochondrial enzymes that are involved in reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation include the electron-transport chain (ETC) complexes I, II and III; pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH). The transfer of electrons to oxygen, generating superoxide, happens mainly when these redox carriers are charged enough with electrons and the potential energy for transfer is elevated, like in the case of high mitochondrial membrane potential. In contrast, ROS generation is decreased if there are not enough electrons and the potential energy for the transfer is not sufficient (reviewed in Lin and Beal, 2006).</p>
<p>Cells are also able to detoxify the generated ROS due to an extensive antioxidant defence system that includes superoxide dismutases, glutathione peroxidases, catalase, thioredoxins, and peroxiredoxins in various cell organelles (reviewed in Lin and Beal, 2006). It is worth mentioning that, as in the case of ROS generation, antioxidant defences are also closely related to the redox and energetic status of mitochondria. If mitochondria are structurally and functionally healthy, an antioxidant defence mechanism balances ROS generation, and there is not much available ROS production. However, in case of mitochondrial damage, the antioxidant defence capacity drops and ROS generation takes over. Once this happens, a vicious cycle starts and ROS can further damage mitochondria, leading to more free-radical generation and further loss of antioxidant capacity. During mitochondrial dysfunction the availability of ATP also decreases, which is considered necessary for repair mechanisms after ROS generation.</p>
<p>A number of proteins bound to the mitochondria or endoplasmic reticulum (ER), especially in the mitochondria-associated ER membrane (MAM), are playing an important role of communicators between these two organelles (reviewed Mei et al., 2013). ER stress induces mitochondrial dysfunction through regulation of Ca2+ signaling and ROS production (reviewed Mei et al., 2013). Prolonged ER stress leads to release of Ca2+ at the MAM and increased Ca2+ uptake into the mitochondrial matrix, which induces Ca2+-dependent mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization and apoptosis. At the same, ROS are produced by proteins in the ER oxidoreductin 1 (ERO1) family. ER stress activates ERO1 and leads to excessive production of ROS, which, in turn, inactivates SERCA and activates inositol-1,4,5- trisphosphate receptors (IP3R) via oxidation, resulting in elevated levels of cytosolic Ca2+, increased mitochondrial uptake of Ca2+, and ultimately mitochondrial dysfunction. Just as ER stress can lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, mitochondrial dysfunction also induces ER Stress (reviewed Mei et al., 2013). For example, nitric oxide disrupts the mitochondrial respiratory chain and causes changes in mitochondrial Ca2+ flux which induce ER stress. Increased Ca2+ flux triggers loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), release of cytochrome c and apoptosis inducing factor (AIF), decreasing ATP synthesis and rendering the cells more vulnerable to both apoptosis and necrosis (Wang and Qin, 2010).</p>
<p><strong>Summing up:</strong> Mitochondria play a pivotal role in cell survival and cell death because they are regulators of both energy metabolism and apoptotic/necrotic pathways (Fiskum, 2000; Wieloch, 2001; Friberg and Wieloch, 2002). The production of ATP via oxidative phosphorylation is a vital mitochondrial function (Kann and Kovács, 2007; Nunnari and Suomalainen, 2012). The ATP is continuously required for signalling processes (e.g. Ca2+ signalling), maintenance of ionic gradients across membranes, and biosynthetic processes (e.g. protein synthesis, heme synthesis or lipid and phospholipid metabolism) (Kang and Pervaiz, 2012), and (Green, 1998; McBride et al., 2006). Inhibition of mitochondrial respiration contributes to various cellular stress responses, such as deregulation of cellular Ca2+ homeostasis (Graier et al., 2007) and ROS production (Nunnari and Suomalainen, 2012; reviewed Mei et al., 2013).). It is well established in the existing literature that mitochondrial dysfunction may result in: (a) an increased ROS production and a decreased ATP level, (b) the loss of mitochondrial protein import and protein biosynthesis, (c) the reduced activities of enzymes of the mitochondrial respiratory chain and the Krebs cycle, (d) the loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential, (e) the loss of mitochondrial motility, causing a failure to re-localize to the sites with increased energy demands (f) the destruction of the mitochondrial network, and (g) increased mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, causing Ca2+ overload (reviewed in Lin and Beal, 2006; Graier et al., 2007), (h) the rupture of the mitochondrial inner and outer membranes, leading to (i) the release of mitochondrial pro-death factors, including cytochrome c (Cyt. c), apoptosis-inducing factor, or endonuclease G (Braun, 2012; Martin, 2011; Correia et al., 2012; Cozzolino et al., 2013), which eventually leads to apoptotic, necrotic or autophagic cell death (Wang and Qin, 2010). Due to their structural and functional complexity, mitochondria present multiple targets for various compounds.</p>
<p>Mitochondrial dysfunction can be detected using isolated mitochondria, intact cells or cells in culture as well as in vivo studies. Such assessment can be performed with a large range of methods (revised by Brand and Nicholls, 2011) for which some important examples are given. All approaches to assess mitochondrial dysfunction fall into two main categories: the first assesses the consequences of a loss-of-function, i.e. impaired functioning of the respiratory chain and processes linked to it. Some assay to assess this have been described for KE1, with the limitation that they are not specific for complex I. In the context of overall mitochondrial dysfunction, the same assays provide useful information, when performed under slightly different assay conditions (e.g. without addition of complex III and IV inhibitors). The second approach assesses a ‘non-desirable gain-of-function’, i.e. processes that are usually only present to a very small degree in healthy cells, and that are triggered in a cell, in which mitochondria fail.</p>
<p>I. Mitochondrial dysfunction assays assessing a loss-of function.</p>
<p>1. Cellular oxygen consumption.</p>
<p>See KE1 for details of oxygen consumption assays. The oxygen consumption parameter can be combined with other endpoints to derive more specific information on the efficacy of mitochondrial function. One approach measures the ADP-to-O ratio (the number of ADP molecules phosphorylated per oxygen atom reduced (Hinkle, 1995 and Hafner et al., 1990). The related P/O ratio is calculated from the amount of ADP added, divided by the amount of O<sub>2</sub> consumed while phosphorylating the added ADP (Ciapaite et al., 2005; Diepart et al., 2010; Hynes et al., 2006; James et al., 1995; von Heimburg et al., 2005).</p>
<p>2. Mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm ).</p>
<p>The mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) is the electric potential difference across the inner mitochondrial membrane. It requires a functioning respiratory chain in the absence of mechanisms that dissipate the proton gradient without coupling it to ATP production. The classical, and still most quantitative method uses a tetraphenylphosphonium ion (TPP+)-sensitive electrode on suspensions of isolated mitochondria. The Δψm can also be measured in live cells by fluorimetric methods. These are based on dyes which accumulate in mitochochondria because of Δψm. Frequently used are tetramethylrhodamineethylester (TMRE), tetramethylrhodaminemethyl ester (TMRM) (Petronilli et al., 1999) or 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazole carbocyanide iodide (JC-1). Mitochondria with intact membrane potential concentrate JC-1, so that it forms red fluorescent aggregates, whereas de-energized mitochondria cannot concentrate JC-1 and the dilute dye fluoresces green (Barrientos et al., 1999). Assays using TMRE or TMRM measure only at one wavelength (red fluorescence), and depending on the assay setup, de-energized mitochondria become either less fluorescent (loss of the dye) or more fluorescent (attenuated dye quenching).</p>
<p>3. Enzymatic activity of the electron transport system (ETS).</p>
<p>Determination of ETS activity can be dene following Owens and King's assay (1975). The technique is based on a cell-free homogenate that is incubated with NADH to saturate the mitochondrial ETS and an artificial electron acceptor [l - (4 -iodophenyl) -3 - (4 -nitrophenyl) -5-phenylte trazolium chloride (INT)] to register the electron transmission rate. The oxygen consumption rate is calculated from the molar production rate of INT-formazan which is determined spectrophotometrically (Cammen et al., 1990).</p>
<p>4. ATP content.</p>
<p>For the evaluation of ATP levels, various commercially-available ATP assay kits are offered based on luciferin and luciferase activity. For isolated mitochondria various methods are available to continuously measure ATP with electrodes (Laudet 2005), with luminometric methods, or for obtaining more information on different nucleotide phosphate pools (e.g. Ciapaite et al., (2005).</p>
<p><br />
II. Mitochondrial dysfunction assays assessing a gain-of function.</p>
<p><br />
1. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening (PTP).</p>
<p>The opening of the PTP is associated with a permeabilization of mitochondrial membranes, so that different compounds and cellular constituents can change intracellular localization. This can be measured by assessment of the translocation of cytochrome c, adenylate kinase or AIF from mitochondria to the cytosol or nucleus. The translocation can be assessed biochemically in cell fractions, by imaging approaches in fixed cells or tissues or by life-cell imaging of GFP fusion proteins (Single 1998; Modjtahedi 2006). An alternative approach is to measure the accessibility of cobalt to the mitochondrial matrix in a calcein fluorescence quenching assay in live permeabilized cells (Petronilli et al., 1999).</p>
<p>2. mtDNA damage as a biomarker of mitochondrial dysfunction.</p>
<p>Various quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR)-based assays have been developed to detect changes of DNA structure and sequence in the mitochondrial genome. mtDNA damage can be detected in blood after low-level rotenone exposure, and the damage persists even after CI activity has returned to normal. With a more sustained rotenone exposure, mtDNA damage is also detected in skeletal muscle. These data support the idea that mtDNA damage in peripheral tissues in the rotenone model may provide a biomarker of past or ongoing mitochondrial toxin exposure (Sanders et al., 2014a and 2014b).</p>
<p>3. Generation of ROS and resultant oxidative stress.</p>
<p>a. General approach. Electrons from the mitochondrial ETS may be transferred ‘erroneously’ to molecular oxygen to form superoxide anions. This type of side reaction can be strongly enhanced upon mitochondrial damage. As superoxide may form hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals or other reactive oxygen species, a large number of direct ROS assays and assays assessing the effects of ROS (indirect ROS assays) are available (Adam-Vizi, 2005; Fan and Li 2014). Direct assays are based on the chemical modification of fluorescent or luminescent reporters by ROS species. Indirect assays assess cellular metabolites, the concentration of which is changed in the presence of ROS (e.g. glutathione, malonaldehyde, isoprostanes,etc.) At the animal level the effects of oxidative stress are measured from biomarkers in the blood or urine.</p>
<p>b. Measurement of the cellular glutathione (GSH) status. GSH is regenerated from its oxidized form (GSSH) by the action of an NADPH dependent reductase (GSSH + NADPH + H+ à 2 GSH + NADP+). The ratio of GSH/GSSG is therefore a good indicator for the cellular NADH+/NADPH ratio (i.e. the redox potential). GSH and GSSH levels can be determined by HPLC, capillary electrophoresis, or biochemically with DTNB (Ellman’s reagent). As excess GSSG is rapidly exported from most cells to maintain a constant GSH/GSSG ratio, a reduction of total glutathione (GSH/GSSG) is often a good surrogate measure for oxidative stress.</p>
<p>c. Quantification of lipid peroxidation. Measurement of lipid peroxidation has historically relied on the detection of thiobarbituric acid (TBA)-reactive compounds such as malondialdehyde generated from the decomposition of cellular membrane lipid under oxidative stress (Pryor et al., 1976). This method is quite sensitive, but not highly specific. A number of commercial assay kits are available for this assay using absorbance or fluorescence detection technologies. The formation of F2-like prostanoid derivatives of arachidonic acid, termed F2-isoprostanes (IsoP) has been shown to be more specific for lipid peroxidation. A number of commercial ELISA kits have been developed for IsoPs, but interfering agents in samples requires partial purification before analysis. Alternatively, GC/MS may be used, as robust (specific) and sensitive method.</p>
<p><br />
d. Detection of superoxide production. Generation of superoxide by inhibition of complex I and the methods for its detection are described by Grivennikova and Vinogradov (2014). A range of different methods is also described by BioTek (<a class="external free" href="http://www.biotek.com/resources/articles/reactive-oxygen-species.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.biotek.com/resources/articles/reactive-oxygen-species.html</a>). The reduction of ferricytochrome c to ferrocytochrome c may be used to assess the rate of superoxide formation (McCord, 1968). Like in other superoxide assays, specificity can only be obtained by measurements in the absence and presence of superoxide dismutase. Chemiluminescent reactions have been used for their increased sensitivity. The most widely used chemiluminescent substrate is lucigenin. Coelenterazine has also been used as a chemiluminescent substrate. Hydrocyanine dyes are fluorogenic sensors for superoxide and hydroxyl radical, and they become membrane impermeable after oxidation (trapping at site of formation). The best characterized of these probes are Hydro-Cy3 and Hydro-Cy5. generation of superoxide in mitochondria can be visualized using fluorescence microscopy with MitoSOX™ Red reagent (Life Technologies). MitoSOX™ Red reagent is a cationic derivative of dihydroethidium that permeates live cells and accumulates in mitochondria.</p>
<p>e. Detection of hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) production. There are a number of fluorogenic substrates, which serve as hydrogen donors that have been used in conjunction with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) enzyme to produce intensely fluorescent products in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (Zhou et al., 1997: Ruch et al., 1983). The more commonly used substrates include diacetyldichloro-fluorescein, homovanillic acid, and Amplex® Red. In these examples, increasing amounts of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> form increasing amounts of fluorescent product (Tarpley et al., 2004).</p>
<p>Summing up, mitochondrial dysfunction can be measured by: • ROS production: superoxide (O2-), and hydroxyl radicals (OH−) • Nitrosative radical formation such as ONOO− or directly by: • Loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) • Opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores (mPTP) • ATP synthesis • Increase in mitochondrial Ca2+ • Cytochrome c release • AIF (apoptosis inducing factor) release from mitochondria • Mitochondrial Complexes enzyme activity • Measurements of mitochondrial oxygen consumption • Ultrastructure of mitochondria using electron microscope and mitochondrial fragmentation measured by labelling with DsRed-Mito expression (Knott et al, 2008) Mitochondrial dysfunction-induced oxidative stress can be measured by: • Reactive carbonyls formations (proteins oxidation) • Increased 8-oxo-dG immunoreactivity (DNA oxidation) • Lipid peroxidation (formation of malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4- hydroxynonenal (HNE) • 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) formation, marker of protein nitration • Translocation of Bid and Bax to mitochondria • Measurement of intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i): Cells are loaded with 4 μM fura-2/AM). • Ratio between reduced and oxidized form of glutathione (GSH depletion) (Promega assay, TB369; Radkowsky et al., 1986) • Neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) activation that is Ca2+-dependent. All above measurements can be performed as the assays for each readout are well established in the existing literature (e.g. Bal-Price and Brown, 2000; Bal-Price et al., 2002; Fujikawa, 2015; Walker et al., 1995). See also KE <a href="/wiki/index.php/Event:209" title="Event:209"> Oxidative Stress, Increase</a></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Assay Type & Measured Content</strong></p>
</td>
<td><strong>Description</strong></td>
<td><strong>Dose Range Studied</strong></td>
<td>
<p><strong>Assay Characteristics</strong></p>
<p><strong>(Length/Ease of use/Accuracy)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Rhodamine 123 Assay</strong></p>
<p>Measuring Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and its collapse </p>
<p>(Shaki et al., 2012)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Mitochondrial uptake of cationic fluorescent dye, rhodamine 123, is used for estimation of mitochondrial membrane potential. The fluorescence was monitored using Schimadzou RF-5000U fluorescence spectrophotometer at the excitation and emission wavelength of 490 nm and 535 nm, respectively.</p>
</td>
<td>50, 100 and 500 μM of uranyl acetate</td>
<td>
<p>Short / easy</p>
<p>Medium accurancy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>TMRE fluorescence Assay</strong></p>
<p>Measuring Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening</p>
<p>(Huser et al., 1998)</p>
</td>
<td>Laser scanning confocal microscopy in combination with the potentiometric fluorescence dye tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester to monitor relative changes in membrane potential in single isolated cardiac mitochondria. The cationic dye distributes across the membrane in a voltage-dependent manner. Therefore, the large potential gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane results in the accumulation of the fluorescent dye within the matrix compartment. Rapid depolarizations are caused by the opening of the transition pore.</td>
<td>1 µM cyclosporin A</td>
<td>
<p>Short / easy</p>
<p>Low accurancy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>GSH / GSSG Determination Assay</strong></p>
<p>Measuring cellular glutathione (GSH) status; ratio of GSH/GSSG</p>
<p>(Owen & Butterfield, 2010; Shaki et al., 2013)</p>
</td>
<td>GSH and GSSG levels are determinted biochemically with DTNB (Ellman’s reagent). The developed yellow color was read at 412 nm on a spectrophotometer.</td>
<td>100 µM uranyl acetate</td>
<td>
<p>Short / easy</p>
<p>Low accurancy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>TBARS Assay</strong></p>
<p>Quantification of lipid peroxidation</p>
<p>(Yuan et al., 2016)</p>
</td>
<td>MDA content, a product of lipid peroxidation, was measured using a thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay. Briefly, the kidney cells were collected in 1 ml PBS buffer solution (pH 7.4) and sonicated. MDA reacts with thiobarbituric acid forming a colored product which can be measured at an absorbance of 532 nm.</td>
<td>200, 400, 800 µM uranyl acetate</td>
<td>
<p>Medium / medium</p>
<p>High accurancy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Aequorin-based bioluminescence assay</strong></p>
<p>Increase in mitochondrial Ca<sup>2+</sup> influx</p>
<p>(Pozzan & Rudolf, 2009)</p>
</td>
<td>Together with GFP, the aequorin moiety acts as Ca<sup>2+</sup> sensor <em>in vivo</em>, which delivers emission energy to the GFP acceptor molecule in a BRET (Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer) process; the Ca2+ can then be visualized with fluorescence microscopy.</td>
<td> </td>
<td>
<p>Short / easy</p>
<p>Low accurancy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Western blot & immunostaining analyses</strong></p>
<p>Measuring cytochrome c release</p>
(Chen et al., 2000)</td>
<td>Examining the redistribution of Cyto c in cytosolic and mitochondrial cellular fractions. Cells are homogenized and centrifuged, then prepared for immunoblots. Cellular fractions were washed in PBS and lysed in 1% NP-40 buffer. Cellular proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, probed using immunoblot analyses with antibodies specific to cyto c (6581A for Western and 65971A for immunostaining; Pharmingen)</td>
<td> </td>
<td>
<p>Short / easy</p>
<p>Medium accurancy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Quantikine Rat/Mouse Cytochrome c Immunoassay</strong></p>
<p>Measuring cytochrome c release</p>
<p>(Shaki et al., 2012)</p>
</td>
<td>Cytochrome C release was measured a monoclonal antibody specific for rat/mouse cytochrome c was precoated onto the microplate. Seventy-five microliter of conjugate (containing mono- clonal antibody specific for cytochrome c conjugated to horseradish peroxidase). After 2 h of incubation, the substrate solution (100 μl) was added to each well and incubated for 30 min. After 100 μl of the stop solution was added to each well; the optical density of each well was determined by the aforementioned microplate spectrophotometer set to 450 nm.</td>
<td> </td>
<td>
<p>Short / easy</p>
<p>Low accurancy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Membrane potential and cell viability – Flow Cytometry</strong></p>
<p>Measuring cytochrome c release</p>
<p>(Kruidering et al., 1997)</p>
</td>
<td>“Dc and viability were determined by analyzing the R123 and propidium iodide fluorescence intensity with a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) equipped with an argon laser, with the Lysis software program (Becton Dickinson). R123 is a cationic dye that accumulates in the negatively charged inner side of the mitochondria. When the potential drops, less R123 accumulates in the mitochondria, which results in a lower fluorescence signal. The potential was measured as follows: at the indicated times, a 500-ml sample of the cell suspension was taken and transferred to an Eppendorf minivial. To this sample, 100 ml of 6 mM R123 in buffer D was added. After incubation for 10 min at 37°C, the cell suspension was centrifuged for 5 min at 80 3 <em>g</em>. The cell pellet was resuspended in 200 ml of buffer D, containing 0.2 mM R123 and 10 mM propidium iodide, to prevent loss of R123 and to stain nonviable cells, respectively. The samples were transferred to FACScan tubes and analyzed immediately. Analysis was performed at a flow rate of<br />
60 ml/min. R123 fluorescence was detected by the FL1 detector with an emission detection limit below 560 nm. Propidium iodide fluorescence was detected by the FL3 detector, with emission detection above 620 nm. Per sample 3,000 to 5,000 cells were counted (Van de Water <em>et al.</em>, 1993)”</td>
<td> </td>
<td>
<p>Short / easy</p>
<p>Medium accurancy</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Mitochondrial dysfunction is a universal event occurring in cells of any species (Farooqui and Farooqui, 2012). Many invertebrate species (drosophila, C, elegans) are considered as potential models to study mitochondrial function. New data on marine invertebrates, such as molluscs and crustaceans and non-Drosophila species, are emerging (Martinez-Cruz et al., 2012). Mitochondrial dysfunction can be measured in animal models used for toxicity testing (Winklhofer and Haass, 2010; Waerzeggers et al., 2010) as well as in humans (Winklhofer and Haass, 2010).</p>
CL:0000255eukaryotic cellNot SpecifiedUnspecificNot SpecifiedAll life stagesHighHighHigh<p> </p>
<p>Adam-Vizi V. Production of reactive oxygen species in brain mitochondria: contribution by electron transport chain and non-electron transport chain sources. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005, 7(9-10):1140-1149.</p>
<p>Bal-Price A. and Guy C. Brown. Nitric-oxide-induced necrosis and apoptosis in PC12 cells mediated by mitochondria. J. Neurochemistry, 2000, 75: 1455-1464.</p>
<p>Bal-Price A, Matthias A, Brown GC., Stimulation of the NADPH oxidase in activated rat microglia removes nitric oxide but induces peroxynitrite production. J. Neurochem. 2002, 80: 73-80.</p>
<p>Belyaeva, E. A., Sokolova, T. V., Emelyanova, L. V., & Zakharova, I. O. (2012). Mitochondrial electron transport chain in heavy metal-induced neurotoxicity : Effects of cadmium , mercury , and copper. Thescientificworld, 2012, 1-14. doi:10.1100/2012/136063</p>
<p>Brand MD, Nicholls DG. Assessing mitochondrial dysfunction in cells. Biochem J. 2011 Apr 15;435(2):297-312.</p>
<p>Braun RJ. (2012). Mitochondrion-mediated cell death: dissecting yeast apoptosis for a better understanding of neurodegeneration. Front Oncol 2:182.</p>
<p>Barrientos A., and Moraes C.T. (1999) Titrating the Effects of Mitochondrial Complex I Impairment in the Cell Physiology. Vol. 274, No. 23, pp. 16188–16197.</p>
<p>Cammen M. Corwin, Susannah Christensen. John P. (1990) Electron transport system (ETS) activity as a measure of benthic macrofaunal metabolism MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES- (65) : 171-182.</p>
<p>Chen, Q., Gong, B., & Almasan, A. (2000). Distinct stages of cytochrome c release from mitochondria: Evidence for a feedback amplification loop linking caspase activation to mitochondrial dysfunction in genotoxic stress induced apoptosis. Cell Death and Differentiation, 7(2), 227-233. doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4400629</p>
<p>Ciapaite, Lolita Van Eikenhorst, Gerco Bakker, Stephan J.L. Diamant, Michaela. Heine, Robert J Wagner, Marijke J. V. Westerhoff, Hans and Klaas Krab (2005) Modular Kinetic Analysis of the Adenine Nucleotide Translocator–Mediated Effects of Palmitoyl-CoA on the Oxidative Phosphorylation in Isolated Rat Liver Mitochondria Diabetes 54:4 944-951.</p>
<p>Correia SC, Santos RX, Perry G, Zhu X, Moreira PI, Smith MA. (2012). Mitochondrial importance in Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol 724:205 – 221.</p>
<p>Cozzolino M, Ferri A, Valle C, Carri MT. (2013). Mitochondria and ALS: implications from novel genes and pathways. Mol Cell Neurosci 55:44 – 49.</p>
<p>Diepart, C, Verrax, J Calderon, PU, Feron, O., Jordan, BF, Gallez, B (2010) Comparison of methods for measuring oxygen consumption in tumor cells in vitroAnalytical Biochemistry 396 (2010) 250–256.</p>
<p>Farooqui T. and . Farooqui, A. A (2012) Oxidative stress in Vertebrates and Invertebrate: molecular aspects of cell signalling. Wiley-Blackwell,Chapter 27, pp:377- 385.</p>
<p>Fan LM, Li JM. Evaluation of methods of detecting cell reactive oxygen species production for drug screening and cell cycle studies. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2014 Jul-Aug;70(1):40-7.</p>
<p>Fiskum G. Mitochondrial participation in ischemic and traumatic neural cell death. J Neurotrauma. 2000 Oct;17(10):843-55.</p>
<p>Friberg H, Wieloch T. (2002). Mitochondrial permeability transition in acute neurodegeneration. Biochimie 84:241–250.</p>
<p>Fujikawa DG, The Role of Excitotoxic Programmed Necrosis in Acute Brain Injury. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2015, 13: 212–221.</p>
<p>Graier WF, Frieden M, Malli R. (2007). Mitochondria and Ca2+ signaling: old guests, new functions. Pflugers Arch 455:375–396.</p>
<p>Green DR. (1998). Apoptotic pathways: the roads to ruin. Cell 94:695-698.</p>
<p>Grivennikova VG, Vinogradov AD. Generation of superoxide by the mitochondrial Complex I. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006, 1757(5-6):553-61.</p>
<p>Hafner RP, Brown GC, Brand MD: Analysis of the control of respiration rate, phosphorylation rate, proton leak rate and protonmotive force in isolated mitochondria using the ‘top-down’ approach of metabolic control theory. Eur J Biochem188 :313 –319,1990.</p>
<p>Hao, Y., Huang, J., Liu, C., Li, H., Liu, J., Zeng, Y., . . . Li, R. (2016). Differential protein expression in metallothionein protection from depleted uranium-induced nephrotoxicity. Scientific Reports, doi:10.1038/srep38942</p>
<p>Hao, Y., Ren, J., Liu, C., Li, H., Liu, J., Yang, Z., . . . Su, Y. (2014). Zinc protects human kidney cells from depleted uranium induced apoptosis. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 114, 271-280. doi:10.1111/bcpt.12167</p>
<p>Hinkle PC (1995) Measurement of ADP/O ratios. In Bioenergetics: A Practical Approach. Brown GC, Cooper CE, Eds. Oxford, U.K., IRL Press, p.5 –6.</p>
<p>Huerta-García, E., Perez-Arizti, J. A., Marquez-Ramirez, S. G., Delgado-Buenrostro, N. L., Chirino, Y. I., Iglesias, G. G., & Lopez-Marure, R. (2014). Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce strong oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in glial cells. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 73, 84-94. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.04.026</p>
<p>Hüser, J., Rechenmacher, C. E., & Blatter, L. A. (1998). Imaging the permeability pore transition in single mitochondria. Biophysical Journal, 74(4), 2129-2137. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77920-2</p>
<p>Hynes, J.. Marroquin, L.D Ogurtsov, V.I. Christiansen, K.N. Stevens, G.J. Papkovsky, D.B. Will, Y. (2006)) Investigation of drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity using fluorescence-based oxygen-sensitive probes, Toxicol. Sci. 92 186–200.</p>
<p>James, P.E. Jackson, S.K.. Grinberg, O.Y Swartz, H.M. (1995) The effects of endotoxin on oxygen consumption of various cell types in vitro: an EPR oximetry study, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 18 (1995) 641–647.</p>
<p>Kang J, Pervaiz S. (2012). Mitochondria: Redox Metabolism and Dysfunction. Biochem Res Int 2012:896751.</p>
<p>Kann O, Kovács R. (2007). Mitochondria and neuronal activity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 292:C641-576.</p>
<p>Karlsson, H. L., Gustafsson, J., Cronholm, P., & Möller, L. (2009). Size-dependent toxicity of metal oxide particles—A comparison between nano- and micrometer size. Toxicology Letters, 188(2), 112-118. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.03.014" target="_blank">10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.03.014</a></p>
<p>Knott Andrew B., Guy Perkins, Robert Schwarzenbacher & Ella Bossy-Wetzel. Mitochondrial fragmentation in neurodegeneration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2008, 229: 505-518.</p>
<p>Kruidering, M., Van De Water, B., De Heer, E., Mulder, G. J., & Nagelkerke, J. F. (1997). Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in porcine proximal tubular cells: Mitochondrial dysfunction by inhibition of complexes I to IV of the respiratory chain. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 280(2), 638-649.</p>
<p>Llaudet E, Hatz S, Droniou M, Dale N. Microelectrode biosensor for real-time measurement of ATP in biological tissue. Anal Chem. 2005, 77(10):3267-73.</p>
<p>Lee HC, Wei YH. (2012). Mitochondria and aging. Adv Exp Med Biol 942:311-327.</p>
<p>Li N, Ragheb K, Lawler G, Sturgis J, Rajwa B, et al. Mitochondrial complex I inhibitor rotenone induces apoptosis through enhancing mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production. J Biol Chem.2003;278:8516–8525.</p>
<p>Lin MT, Beal MF. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 2006. 443:787-795.</p>
<p>Martin LJ. (2011). Mitochondrial pathobiology in ALS. J Bioenerg Biomembr 43:569 – 579.</p>
<p>Martinez-Cruz, Oliviert Sanchez-Paz, Arturo Garcia-Carreño, Fernando Jimenez-Gutierrez, Laura Ma. de los Angeles Navarrete del Toro and Adriana Muhlia-Almazan. Invertebrates Mitochondrial Function and Energetic Challenges (www.intechopen.com), Bioenergetics, Edited by Dr Kevin Clark, <a class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn" href="/wiki/index.php/Special:BookSources/9789535100904">ISBN 978-953-51-0090-4</a>, Publisher InTech, 2012, 181-218.</p>
<p>McBride HM, Neuspiel M, Wasiak S. (2006). Mitochondria: more than just a powerhouse. Curr Biol 16:R551–560.</p>
<p>McCord, J.M. and I. Fidovich (1968) The Reduction of Cytochrome C by Milk Xanthine Oxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 243:5733-5760.</p>
<p>Mei Y, Thompson MD, Cohen RA, Tong X. (2013) Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Related Pathological Processes. J Pharmacol Biomed Anal.. 1:100-107.</p>
<p>Miccadei, S., & Floridi, A. (1993). Sites of inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport by cadmium. Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland Ltd., 89, 159-167.Xu, X. M., & Møller, S. G. (2010). ROS removal by DJ-1: Arabidopsis as a new model to understand Parkinson's Disease. Plant signaling & behavior, 5(8), 1034–1036. doi:10.4161/psb.5.8.12298</p>
<p>Modjtahedi N, Giordanetto F, Madeo F, Kroemer G. Apoptosis-inducing factor: vital and lethal. Trends Cell Biol. 2006 May;16(5):264-72.</p>
<p>Nunnari J, Suomalainen A. (2012). Mitochondria: in sickness and in health. Cell 148:1145–1159. Hajnóczky G, Csordás G, Das S, Garcia-Perez C, Saotome M, Sinha Roy S, Yi M. (2006). Mitochondrial calcium signalling and cell death: approaches for assessing the role of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake in apoptosis. Cell Calcium 40:553-560.</p>
<p>Oliviert Martinez-Cruz, Arturo Sanchez-Paz, Fernando Garcia-Carreño, Laura Jimenez-Gutierrez, Ma. de los Angeles Navarrete del Toro and Adriana Muhlia-Almazan. Invertebrates Mitochondrial Function and Energetic Challenges (www.intechopen.com), Bioenergetics, Edited by Dr Kevin Clark, <a href="/wiki/index.php/Special:BookSources/9789535100904">ISBN 978-953-51-0090-4</a>, Publisher InTech, 2012, 181-218.</p>
<p>Owen, J. B., & Butterfield, D. A. (2010). Measurement of oxidized/reduced glutathione ratio. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 648, 269-277. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-756-3_18 [doi]</p>
<p>Owens R.G. and King F.D. The measurement of respiratory lectron-transport system activity in marine zooplankton. Mar. Biol. 1975, 30:27-36.</p>
<p>Pan, Y., Leifer, A., Ruau, D., Neuss, S., Bonrnemann, J., Schmid, G., . . . Jahnen-Dechent, W. (2009). Gold nanoparticles of diameter 1.4 nm trigger necrosis by oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Small, 5(8), 2067-2076. doi:10.1002/smll.200900466</p>
<p>Petronilli V, Miotto G, Canton M, Brini M, Colonna R, Bernardi P, Di Lisa F: Transient and long-lasting openings of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore can be monitored directly in intact cells by changes in mitochondrial calcein fluorescence. Biophys J 1999, 76:725-734.</p>
<p>Pozzan, T., & Rudolf, R. (2009). Measurements of mitochondrial calcium in vivo. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 1787(11), 1317-1323. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.11.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.11.012</a></p>
<p>Promega GSH-Glo Glutathione Assay Technical Bulletin, TB369, Promega Corporation, Madison, WI.</p>
<p>Pryor, W.A., J.P. Stanley, and E. Blair. (1976) Autoxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids: II. A Suggested mechanism for the Formation of TBA-reactive materials from prostaglandin-like Endoperoxides. Lipids, 11:370-379.</p>
<p>Radkowsky, A.E. and E.M. Kosower (1986) Bimanes 17. (Haloalkyl)-1,5-diazabicyclo[3.3.O]octadienediones (halo-9,10- dioxabimanes): reactivity toward the tripeptide thiol, glutathione, J. Am. Chem. Soc 108:4527-4531.</p>
<p>Ruch, W., P.H. Cooper, and M. Baggiollini (1983) Assay of H2O2 production by macrophages and neutrophils with Homovanillic acid and horseradish peroxidase. J. Immunol Methods 63:347-357.</p>
<p>Sanders LH, McCoy J, Hu X, Mastroberardino PG, Dickinson BC, Chang CJ, Chu CT, Van Houten B, Greenamyre JT. (2014a). Mitochondrial DNA damage: molecular marker of vulnerable nigral neurons in Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis. 70:214-23.</p>
<p>Sanders LH, Howlett EH2, McCoy J, Greenamyre JT. (2014b) Mitochondrial DNA damage as a peripheral biomarker for mitochondrial toxin exposure in rats. Toxicol Sci. Dec;142(2):395-402.</p>
<p>Shaki, F., Hosseini, M. J., Ghazi-Khansari, M., & Pourahmad, J. (2012). Toxicity of depleted uranium on isolated rat kidney mitochondria. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta - General Subjects, 1820(12), 1940-1950. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.08.015</p>
<p>Shaki, F., Hosseini, M., Ghazi-Khansari, M., & Pourahmad, J. (2013). Depleted uranium induces disruption of energy homeostasis and oxidative stress in isolated rat brain mitochondria. Metallomics, 5(6), 736-744. doi:10.1039/c3mt00019b</p>
<p>Single B, Leist M, Nicotera P. Simultaneous release of adenylate kinase and cytochrome c in cell death. Cell Death Differ. 1998 Dec;5(12):1001-3.</p>
<p>Tahira Farooqui and Akhlaq A. Farooqui. (2012) Oxidative stress in Vertebrates and Invertebrate: molecular aspects of cell signalling. Wiley-Blackwell,Chapter 27, pp:377- 385.</p>
<p>Tarpley, M.M., D.A. Wink, and M.B. Grisham (2004) Methods for detection of reactive Metabolites of Oxygen and Nitrogen: in vitro and in vivo considerations. Am . J. Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 286:R431-R444.</p>
<p>von Heimburg, D. Hemmrich, K. Zachariah S.,. Staiger, H Pallua, N.(2005) Oxygen consumption in undifferentiated versus differentiated adipogenic mesenchymal precursor cells, Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 146 (2005) 107–116.</p>
<p>Waerzeggers, Yannic Monfared, Parisa Viel, Thomas Winkeler, Alexandra Jacobs, Andreas H. (2010) Mouse models in neurological disorders: Applications of non-invasive imaging, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, Volume 1802, Issue 10, Pages 819-839.</p>
<p>Walker JE, Skehel JM, Buchanan SK. (1995) Structural analysis of NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase from bovine heart mitochondria. Methods Enzymol.;260:14–34.</p>
<p>Wang A, Costello S, Cockburn M, Zhang X, Bronstein J, Ritz B. (2011). Parkinson’s disease risk from ambient exposure to pesticides. Eur J Epidemiol 26:547-555.</p>
<p>Wang, L., Li, J., Li, J., & Liu, Z. (2009). Effects of lead and/or cadmium on the oxidative damage of rat kidney cortex mitochondria. Biol.Trace Elem.Res., 137, 69-78. doi:10.1007/s12011-009-8560-1</p>
<p>Wang Y., and Qin ZH., Molecular and cellular mechanisms of excitotoxic neuronal death, Apoptosis, 2010, 15:1382-1402.</p>
<p>Wieloch T. (2001). Mitochondrial Involvement in Acute Neurodegeneration 52:247–254.</p>
<p>Winklhofer, K. Haass,C (2010) Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson's disease, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, 1802: 29-44.</p>
<p>Yuan, Y., Zheng, J., Zhao, T., Tang, X., & Hu, N. (2016). Uranium-induced rat kidney cell cytotoxicity is mediated by decreased endogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) generation involved in reduced Nrf2 levels. Toxicology Research, 5(2), 660-673. doi:10.1039/C5TX00432B</p>
<p>Zhang, H., Chang, Z., Mehmood, K., Abbas, R. Z., Nabi, F., Rehman, M. U., . . . Zhou, D. (2018). Nano copper induces apoptosis in PK-15 cells via a mitochondria-mediated pathway. Biological Trace Element Research, 181(1), 62-70. doi:10.1007/s12011-017-1024-0</p>
<p>Zhou, M., Z.Diwu, Panchuk-Voloshina, N. and R.P. Haughland (1997), A Stable nonfluorescent derivative of resorufin for the fluorometric determination of trace hydrogen peroxide: application in detecting the activity of phagocyte NADPH oxidase and other oxidases. Anal. Biochem 253:162-168.</p>
2016-11-29T18:41:232022-03-07T07:12:30Increase, DNA damageIncrease, DNA DamageMolecular<p>DNA nucleotide damage, single, and double strand breaks occur in the course of cellular operations such as DNA repair and replication and can be induced directly and in neighboring “bystander” cells by internal or external stressors like reactive oxygen species, chemicals, and radiation. Ionizing radiation and RONS such as hydroxyl radicals or peroxide can create a range of lesions (a change in molecular structure) in the base of the nucleotide, with guanine particularly vulnerable because of its low redox potential (David, O'Shea et al. 2007). The same stressors can also break the sugar (deoxyribose)-phosphate backbone creating a single strand break. Simultaneous proximal breaks in both strands of DNA form double strand breaks, which are considered to be more destructive and mutagenic than lesions or single strand breaks. Double strand breaks can generate chromosomal abnormalities including changes in chromosomal number, breaks and gaps, translocations, inversions, and deletions (Yang, Craise et al. 1992; Haag, Hsu et al. 1996; Ponnaiya, Cornforth et al. 1997; Yang, Georgy et al. 1997; Unger, Wienberg et al. 2010; Behjati, Gundem et al. 2016; Morishita, Muramatsu et al. 2016).</p>
<p>However, DNA lesions and single strand breaks can also be destructive and mutagenic. Lesions can lead to point mutations (David, O'Shea et al. 2007) or single strand breaks (Regulus, Duroux et al. 2007). Lesions and single strand breaks can also promote the formation of double strand breaks: replication fork collapse and double strand breaks sometimes occur during mitosis when the replisome encounters an unrepaired single strand break (Kuzminov 2001), and clustered lesions and closely opposed single strand breaks can also form double strand breaks (Chaudhry and Weinfeld 1997; Vispe and Satoh 2000; Shiraishi, Shikazono et al. 2017). Complex damage consists of any combination of closely opposed DNA lesions, abasic sites, crosslinks, single, or double strand breaks in proximity. While classically induced by ionizing radiation, there is also evidence that it can be induced by oxidative activity (Sharma, Collins et al. 2016) or even by a single oxidizing particle (Ravanat, Breton et al. 2014). Complex damage is more difficult to repair (Kuhne, Rothkamm et al. 2000; Stenerlow, Hoglund et al. 2000; Pinto, Prise et al. 2005; Rydberg, Cooper et al. 2005).</p>
<p>DNA damage and resulting repair activity can trigger a halt in the cell cycle, cell death (apoptosis), and cause permanent changes to DNA including deletions, translocations, and sequence changes. DNA damage is also associated with an increase in genomic instability - the new appearance of DNA damage including double strand breaks, mutations, and chromosomal damage following repair of initial damage in affected cells or in clonal descendants or neighbors of DNA damaged cells. The mechanism behind this long term DNA damage is not clear, but telomere erosion appears to play a major role (Murnane 2012; Sishc, Nelson et al. 2015). Genomic instability is more common and longer lasting following complex damage (Ponnaiya, Cornforth et al. 1997), and is influenced by multiple factors including variants in DNA repair genes (Ponnaiya, Cornforth et al. 1997; Yu, Okayasu et al. 2001; Yin, Menendez et al. 2012), RONS (Dayal, Martin et al. 2008), estrogen (Kutanzi and Kovalchuk 2013), caspases (Liu, He et al. 2015), and telomeres (Sishc, Nelson et al. 2015).</p>
<p>DNA damage can be studied in isolated DNA, fixed cells, or living cells. Types of damage that can be detected include single and double strand breaks, nucleotide damage, complex damage, and chromosomal or telomere damage. The OECD test guideline for DNA synthesis Test No. 486 (OECD 1997) detects nucleotide excision repair, so it will reflect the formation of bulky DNA adducts but not the majority of oxidative damage to nucleotides, which is typically repaired via the Base Excision Repair pathway. The OECD test guideline alkaline comet assay Test No. 489 (OECD 2016) detects single and double strand breaks, including those arising from repair as well as some (alkali sensitive) nucleotide lesions including some lesions from oxidative damage. OECD tests for chromosomal damage and micronuclei Test No. 473, 475, 483, and 487 measure longer term effects of DNA damage but these tests require the damaged cell to subsequently undergo replication (OECD 2016; OECD 2016; OECD 2016; OECD 2016). They can therefore reflect a wider range of sources of DNA damage including changes in mitosis. Finally, tests for mutations reveal past DNA damage that resulted in a heritable change, and these are described in the key event ‘Increase in Mutation’.</p>
<p>Many other (non-test guideline) techniques have been used to examine specific forms of DNA damage (Table 1). Double strand breaks are commonly reported because of the significant risk attributed to breaks and the relative ease of detecting and quantifying them. Historically, single and double strand breaks were measured using gel electrophoresis, but are now commonly visualized microscopically using fluorescent or other labeled probes for double and single strand break repair such as H2AX and XRCC2. Base lesions can also be detected using labeled probes for base excision repair enzymes, or by chemical methods such as mass spectroscopy. Refinements on these methods can be used to characterize complex or clustered damage, in which various forms of damage occur in close proximity on a DNA molecule (Lorat, Timm et al. 2016; Nikitaki, Nikolov et al. 2016).</p>
<p>Certain challenges are common to all methods of detecting DNA damage. In the time required to initiate the detection method, some DNA may already be repaired, leading to undercounting of damage. On the other hand, apoptotic DSBs may be incorrectly included in a measurement of direct (non-apoptotic) induction of DSB damage unless controlled. All methods have difficulty distinguishing individual components of clustered lesions, and microscopic methods may undercount disparate breaks that are processed together in repair centers (Barnard, Bouffler et al. 2013). Methods that use isolated DNA (gel electrophoresis, analytical chemistry) are vulnerable to artifacts and must ensure that the DNA sample is protected from oxidative damage during extraction (Pernot, Hall et al. 2012; Barnard, Bouffler et al. 2013; Ravanat, Breton et al. 2014).</p>
<p>Table 1. Common methods of detecting DNA damage</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Target</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p><strong>Name</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p><strong>Method</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p><strong>Strengths/Weaknesses</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Nucleotide damage</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p>Single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) with restriction enzymes (Collins 2004)</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p>Gel electrophoresis</p>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p>A variant of the comet assay in which restriction enzymes allow the identification of different types of nucleotide damage.</p>
<p>The comet assay is more sensitive than PFGE, detecting damage from 0.1 Gy ionizing radiation (Pernot, Hall et al. 2012). A reproducible high-throughput application of the assay is available (Ge, Prasongtanakij et al. 2014; Sykora, Witt et al. 2018), and the test requires only a small (single cell) sample. Requires destruction of the cell.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Nucleotide damage</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p>Labeled probes including Biotrin OxyDNA and anti- 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (OGG1) for oxidative damage and AP</p>
<p>endonuclease (APE1) for Base Excision Repair of less bulky lesions such as oxidative damage.</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p>Microscopy, FACS</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p>Most useful with FACS or other measures of average or relative intensity, as locations and numbers of damaged nucleotides can be difficult to distinguish using fluorescence microscopy. (Ogawa, Kobayashi et al. 2003; Nikitaki, Nikolov et al. 2016).</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Nucleotide damage</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p>High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p>Analytical chemistry</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p>Capable of quantifying low levels of specific nucleotide lesions (Madugundu, Cadet et al. 2014; Ravanat, Breton et al. 2014). Requires destruction of the cell.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Nucleotide damage</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p>Unscheduled DNA synthesis test OECD Test Guideline 486 (OECD 1997)</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p>Autoradiography</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p>Measures DNA damage that is repaired using Nucleotide Excision Repair - mostly bulky adducts (OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) 2016).</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Non-specific DNA strand breaks</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p>Single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay), alkali conditions</p>
<p>OECD Test Guideline 489 (OECD 2016)</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p>Gel electrophoresis</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p>When used in alkali conditions, the comet assay reveals single and double strand breaks and alkali-sensitive nucleotide lesions. See single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) with restriction enzymes above for further comments. </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Single strand breaks</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p>Labeled probe pXRCC1 (Lorat, Brunner et al. 2015)</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p>Microscopy</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p>Fluorescent probes can label single strand breaks in cells, while immunogold labeling is able to distinguish multiple single strand breaks in clusters (Lorat, Timm et al. 2016; Nikitaki, Nikolov et al. 2016).</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Double strand breaks</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p>Single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay), neutral conditions</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p>Gel electrophoresis</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p>Neutral conditions help minimize the release of single strand breaks coiled DNA and alkali lesions, allowing the measurement of double strand breaks. Since single strand breaks can still appear, assay is not very sensitive or specific to double strand breaks (Pernot, Hall et al. 2012). See single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) with restriction enzymes above for further comments.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Double strand breaks</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p>Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p>Gel electrophoresis</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p>Permits the quantitative measurement of double strand breaks, and can be combined with immunoblotting to detect DNA-associated proteins (Lobrich, Rydberg et al. 1995; Kawashima, Yamaguchi et al. 2017). Considered less sensitive than comet assay, but detected damage from 0.25 Gy ionizing radiation (Gradzka and Iwanenko 2005). Requires destruction of the cell.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Double strand breaks</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p>Labeled probes including phosphorylated H2AX, 53BP1, Ku70, ATM (Lorat, Brunner et al. 2015)</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p>Microscopy</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p>Fluorescent probes can label individual double breaks in cells allowing for quantification, with immunogold labeling resolving breaks in clusters (Lorat, Timm et al. 2016; Nikitaki, Nikolov et al. 2016). Sensitive: detects damage from 0.001 Gy ionizing radiation (Rothkamm and Lobrich 2003; Ojima, Ban et al. 2008).</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="height:22px; width:127px">
<p><strong>Chromosomal damage</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:167px">
<p>Chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei</p>
<p>OECD Test Guidelines 473, 475, 483, and 487 (OECD 2016; OECD 2016; OECD 2016; OECD 2016)</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:133px">
<p>Microscopy</p>
</td>
<td style="height:22px; width:211px">
<p>Detects major DNA damage resulting from large breaks and rearrangements, or mitotic failures. Damage does not appear until DNA undergoes mitosis, so slower and limited to damage in replicating cells. Insensitive tosmall deletions and substitutions.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
CL:0000255eukaryotic cell<p><a name="_ENREF_1">Barnard, S., S. Bouffler, et al. (2013). "The shape of the radiation dose response for DNA double-strand break induction and repair." Genome integrity 4(1): 1.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_2">Behjati, S., G. Gundem, et al. (2016). "Mutational signatures of ionizing radiation in second malignancies." Nat Commun 7: 12605.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_3">Chaudhry, M. A. and M. Weinfeld (1997). "Reactivity of human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease and Escherichia coli exonuclease III with bistranded abasic sites in DNA." The Journal of biological chemistry 272(25): 15650-15655.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_4">Collins, A. R. (2004). "The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations." Molecular biotechnology 26(3): 249-261.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_5">David, S. S., V. L. O'Shea, et al. (2007). "Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage." Nature 447(7147): 941-950.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_6">Dayal, D., S. M. Martin, et al. (2008). "Hydrogen peroxide mediates the radiation-induced mutator phenotype in mammalian cells." Biochem J 413(1): 185-191.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_7">Ge, J., S. Prasongtanakij, et al. (2014). "CometChip: a high-throughput 96-well platform for measuring DNA damage in microarrayed human cells." Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE(92): e50607.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_8">Gradzka, I. and T. Iwanenko (2005). "A non-radioactive, PFGE-based assay for low levels of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells." DNA repair 4(10): 1129-1139.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_9">Haag, J. D., L. C. Hsu, et al. (1996). "Allelic imbalance in mammary carcinomas induced by either 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene or ionizing radiation in rats carrying genes conferring differential susceptibilities to mammary carcinogenesis." Mol Carcinog 17(3): 134-143.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_10">Kawashima, Y., N. Yamaguchi, et al. (2017). "Detection of DNA double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis." Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms 22(1): 84-93.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_11">Kuhne, M., K. Rothkamm, et al. (2000). "No dose-dependence of DNA double-strand break misrejoining following alpha-particle irradiation." International journal of radiation biology 76(7): 891-900.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_12">Kutanzi, K. and O. Kovalchuk (2013). "Exposure to estrogen and ionizing radiation causes epigenetic dysregulation, activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, and genome instability in the mammary gland of ACI rats." Cancer Biol Ther 14(7): 564-573.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_13">Kuzminov, A. (2001). "Single-strand interruptions in replicating chromosomes cause double-strand breaks." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98(15): 8241-8246.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_14">Liu, X., Y. He, et al. (2015). "Caspase-3 promotes genetic instability and carcinogenesis." Mol Cell 58(2): 284-296.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_15">Lobrich, M., B. Rydberg, et al. (1995). "Repair of x-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in specific Not I restriction fragments in human fibroblasts: joining of correct and incorrect ends." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92(26): 12050-12054.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_16">Lorat, Y., C. U. Brunner, et al. (2015). "Nanoscale analysis of clustered DNA damage after high-LET irradiation by quantitative electron microscopy--the heavy burden to repair." DNA repair 28: 93-106.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_17">Lorat, Y., S. Timm, et al. (2016). "Clustered double-strand breaks in heterochromatin perturb DNA repair after high linear energy transfer irradiation." Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 121(1): 154-161.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_18">Madugundu, G. S., J. Cadet, et al. (2014). "Hydroxyl-radical-induced oxidation of 5-methylcytosine in isolated and cellular DNA." Nucleic acids research 42(11): 7450-7460.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_19">Morishita, M., T. Muramatsu, et al. (2016). "Chromothripsis-like chromosomal rearrangements induced by ionizing radiation using proton microbeam irradiation system." Oncotarget 7(9): 10182-10192.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_20">Murnane, J. P. (2012). "Telomere dysfunction and chromosome instability." Mutation research 730(1-2): 28-36.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_21">Nikitaki, Z., V. Nikolov, et al. (2016). "Measurement of complex DNA damage induction and repair in human cellular systems after exposure to ionizing radiations of varying linear energy transfer (LET)." Free radical research 50(sup1): S64-S78.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_22">OECD (1997). Test No. 486: Unscheduled DNA Synthesis (UDS) Test with Mammalian Liver Cells in vivo.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_23">OECD (2016). Test No. 473: In Vitro Mammalian Chromosomal Aberration Test.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_24">OECD (2016). Test No. 475: Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosomal Aberration Test.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_25">OECD (2016). Test No. 483: Mammalian Spermatogonial Chromosomal Aberration Test.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_26">OECD (2016). Test No. 487: In Vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_27">OECD (2016). Test No. 489: In Vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_28">OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2016). Overview of the set of OECD Genetic Toxicology Test Guidelines and updates performed in 2014–2015. No. 238.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_29">Ogawa, Y., T. Kobayashi, et al. (2003). "Radiation-induced oxidative DNA damage, 8-oxoguanine, in human peripheral T cells." International journal of molecular medicine 11(1): 27-32.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_30">Ojima, M., N. Ban, et al. (2008). "DNA double-strand breaks induced by very low X-ray doses are largely due to bystander effects." Radiation research 170(3): 365-371.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_31">Pernot, E., J. Hall, et al. (2012). "Ionizing radiation biomarkers for potential use in epidemiological studies." Mutation research 751(2): 258-286.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_32">Pinto, M., K. M. Prise, et al. (2005). "Evidence for complexity at the nanometer scale of radiation-induced DNA DSBs as a determinant of rejoining kinetics." Radiation research 164(1): 73-85.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_33">Ponnaiya, B., M. N. Cornforth, et al. (1997). "Induction of chromosomal instability in human mammary cells by neutrons and gamma rays." Radiation research 147(3): 288-294.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_34">Ponnaiya, B., M. N. Cornforth, et al. (1997). "Radiation-induced chromosomal instability in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice: the difference is as clear as black and white." Radiation research 147(2): 121-125.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_35">Ravanat, J. L., J. Breton, et al. (2014). "Radiation-mediated formation of complex damage to DNA: a chemical aspect overview." Br J Radiol 87(1035): 20130715.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_36">Regulus, P., B. Duroux, et al. (2007). "Oxidation of the sugar moiety of DNA by ionizing radiation or bleomycin could induce the formation of a cluster DNA lesion." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(35): 14032-14037.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_37">Rothkamm, K. and M. Lobrich (2003). "Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(9): 5057-5062.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_38">Rydberg, B., B. Cooper, et al. (2005). "Dose-dependent misrejoining of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in human fibroblasts: experimental and theoretical study for high- and low-LET radiation." Radiation research 163(5): 526-534.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_39">Sharma, V., L. B. Collins, et al. (2016). "Oxidative stress at low levels can induce clustered DNA lesions leading to NHEJ mediated mutations." Oncotarget 7(18): 25377-25390.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_40">Shiraishi, I., N. Shikazono, et al. (2017). "Efficiency of radiation-induced base lesion excision and the order of enzymatic treatment." International journal of radiation biology 93(3): 295-302.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_41">Sishc, B. J., C. B. Nelson, et al. (2015). "Telomeres and Telomerase in the Radiation Response: Implications for Instability, Reprograming, and Carcinogenesis." Front Oncol 5: 257.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_42">Stenerlow, B., E. Hoglund, et al. (2000). "Rejoining of DNA fragments produced by radiations of different linear energy transfer." International journal of radiation biology 76(4): 549-557.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_43">Sykora, P., K. L. Witt, et al. (2018). "Next generation high throughput DNA damage detection platform for genotoxic compound screening." Sci Rep 8(1): 2771.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_44">Unger, K., J. Wienberg, et al. (2010). "Novel gene rearrangements in transformed breast cells identified by high-resolution breakpoint analysis of chromosomal aberrations." Endocrine-related cancer 17(1): 87-98.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_45">Vispe, S. and M. S. Satoh (2000). "DNA repair patch-mediated double strand DNA break formation in human cells." The Journal of biological chemistry 275(35): 27386-27392.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_46">Yang, T.-H., L. M. Craise, et al. (1992). "Chromosomal changes in cultured human epithelial cells transformed by low- and high-LET radiation." Adv Space Res 12(2-3): 127-136.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_47">Yang, T. C., K. A. Georgy, et al. (1997). "Initiation of oncogenic transformation in human mammary epithelial cells by charged particles." Radiat Oncol Investig 5(3): 134-138.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_48">Yin, Z., D. Menendez, et al. (2012). "RAP80 is critical in maintaining genomic stability and suppressing tumor development." Cancer research 72(19): 5080-5090.</a></p>
<p><a name="_ENREF_49">Yu, Y., R. Okayasu, et al. (2001). "Elevated breast cancer risk in irradiated BALB/c mice associates with unique functional polymorphism of the Prkdc (DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit) gene." Cancer Res 61(5): 1820-1824.</a></p>
2016-11-29T18:41:302019-05-08T12:28:46Apoptotic cell deathApoptotic cell deathCellular2020-11-02T07:11:342020-11-02T07:11:34ROS formationROS formationMolecularCL:0000255eukaryotic cell2017-02-15T03:19:502017-09-16T10:17:4408e27672-ced0-439d-bfa2-63a211057fbf27d6d334-1412-4cc2-9f95-29a4d01dfb402022-07-28T03:36:022022-07-28T03:36:02 Toxicological mechanisms of hepatocyte apoptosis through the PARP1 dependent cell death pathway hepatocyte apoptosis<p style="text-align:left"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Xiaoqing Wang,</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> Fei Li</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">, Jialin Liu, Qiongyu Li, Chenglong Ji, </span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Huifeng Wu</span></span></span></span></p>
Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> The changes of PARP1 activity</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> were considered as the molecular initial event. The activated PARP1 affected the downstream key events, such as the damage of mitochondrial structure and function, apoptotic factors AIF release and ROS production and DNA damage. These key events finally induced cell death through </span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">PARP1 dependent pathway</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">. Mitochondrial PARP1 was a vital target to illuminate the early mechanism of apoptosis induced by typical organophosphate ester.</span></span></span></span></p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Triphenyl phosphate (TPP), as a typical aryl organophosphate ester, </span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">has drew much attentio</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">n</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> to its adverse effects</span></span> <span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">(Du et al., 2016; Mendelsohn et al., 2016; Su et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2016)</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">. </span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">It was also considered as a mitochondrial toxicant that could alter mitochondrial function and disorder mitochondria metabolism</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> to exert severe cytotoxicity </span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">(Bowen et al., 2020)</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">. Further research is necessary to explore how TPP affects mitochondrial PARP1 activation in the early stage to cause cell death pathway.</span></span></span></span></p>
adjacentModerateModerate2021-09-13T20:55:172023-04-29T13:02:20