This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 3167

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Decreased COUP-TFII in Leydig cells leads to Decreased steroidogenesis, Decreased Activity of Steroidogenic Enzymes

Upstream event

The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Decreased COUP-TFII in Leydig cells

Downstream event

The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Decreased steroidogenesis, Decreased Activity of Steroidogenic Enzymes

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name	Adjacency	Weight of Evidence	Quantitative Understanding	Point of Contact	Author Status	OECD Status
Decreased, Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter Transcription Factor II (COUP-TFII) leads to Impaired, Spermatogenesis	adjacent	High	Not Specified	Arthur Author (send email)	Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite
Decreased, Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter Transcription Factor II (COUP-TFII) leads to Hypospadias, increased	adjacent	High	Not Specified	Agnes Aggy (send email)	Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER. More help

Term	Scientific Term	Evidence	Link
mammals	mammals	Moderate	NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help

Sex	Evidence
Unspecific	Moderate

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER. More help

Term	Evidence
All life stages	Moderate

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

In this key event relationship we are focused on the decrease in Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter Transcription Factor II (COUP-TFII) gene expression, and corresponding decreased activity of steroidogenesis genes involved in the synthesis of steroid compounds. COUP-TFII is also known as also known as Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 2 Group F Member 2 (NR2F2) (Mendoza-Villarroel et al. 2014).

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings. Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

This Key Event Relationship was developed as part of an Environmental Protection Agency effort to represent putative AOPs from peer-reviewed literature which were heretofore unrepresented in the AOP-Wiki. Palermo et al. (2021) focused on identifying Adverse Outcome Pathways associated with adverse male reproductive outcomes from phthalate exposure through review of existing literature, and provided initial network analysis.

Authors of KER 3167 did a further evaluation of published peer-reviewed literature to provide additional evidence in support of the key event relationship.

Evidence Supporting this KER

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help

Biological Plausibility

Addresses the biological rationale for a connection between KEupstream and KEdownstream. This field can also incorporate additional mechanistic details that help inform the relationship between KEs, this is useful when it is not practical/pragmatic to represent these details as separate KEs due to the difficulty or relative infrequency with which it is likely to be measured. More help

The biological plausibility linking decrease of COUP-TFII gene expression to decreased steroidogenesis is strong. Predominately in laboratory mammal studies, COUP-TFII gene expression has been studied via toxicant exposure as well as contrasting wild-type strains to strains with decreased COUP-TFII function, and consistently shown decreased steroidogenic activity.

Empirical Evidence

Provides specific (citable) evidence that supports the idea of a change in the upstream KE (KEupstream) leading to, or being associated with, a subsequent change in the downstream KE (KEdownstream), assuming the perturbation of KEupstream is sufficient. More help

Species	Duration	Dose	Decreased COUP-TFII?	Decreased Steroidogenic Enzymes?	Summary	Citation
Mouse (Mus musculus)	40 days	Knock-out gene study.	yes	yes	CD1-mice, various cell lines with wild-type and knock-out gene expression, decreased COUP-IIF (NR2F2) expression decreased the steroidogenic acute regulatory (STAR) gene expression.	Mendoza-Villarroel et al. (2014)
Mouse (Mus musculus)	3 months	1 mg/50 g bw tamoxifen for 5 consecutive days in utero, knock-out gene study, juvenile exposure.	yes	yes	COUP-TFII flox/flox mice and CAGG-Cre-ERTM mice, tamoxifen exposure to inhibit COUP-TFII function, decreased COUP-IIF expression decreased 3β-HSD, 450Scc, and CYP17 gene expression, genes related to steroid biosynthesis.	Qin et al. (2008)
Rat (Rattus norvegicus)	8 days	20, 100, 500 mg/kg/day DBP, 100 ug/kg/day dexamethasone, 100 ug/kg diethylstilbestrol every other day, mixture 500 mg/kg/day DBP plus 100 ug/kg day dexamethasone in utero	yes	yes	Wistar rats, dose-dependent response decreased COUP-IIF and decreased STAR, CYP17, CYP11 gene expression, genes related to steroid biosynthesis.	van den Driesche et al. (2012)

Uncertainties and Inconsistencies

Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references. More help

Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage

Captures information that helps to define how much change in the upstream KE, and/or for how long, is needed to elicit a detectable and defined change in the downstream KE. More help

Response-response Relationship

Provides sources of data that define the response-response relationships between the KEs. More help

Time-scale

Information regarding the approximate time-scale of the changes in KEdownstream relative to changes in KEupstream (i.e., do effects on KEdownstream lag those on KEupstream by seconds, minutes, hours, or days?). More help

Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER

Define whether there are known positive or negative feedback mechanisms involved and what is understood about their time-course and homeostatic limits. More help

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

Life Stage: Applies to all life stages.

Sex: Applies to both males and females.

Taxonomic: Most representative studies have been done in mammals (humans, lab mice, lab rats); plausible for all vertebrates.

References

List of the literature that was cited for this KER description. More help

Mendoza-Villarroel, R.E., Robert, N.M., Martin, L.J., Brousseau, C., and Tremblay, J.J. 2014. The Nuclear Receptor NR2F2 Activates Star Expression and Steroidogenesis in Mouse MA-10 and MLTC-1 Leydig Cells. Biology of Reproduction 91(1) Article 26: 1-12.

Palermo, C.M., Foreman, J.E., Wikoff, D.S., and Lea, I. 2021. Development of a putative adverse outcome pathway network for male rat reproductive tract abnormalities with specific considerations for the androgen sensitive window of development. Current Research in Toxicology 2: 254–271.

Qin, J., Tsai, M.-J., and Tsai S.Y. 2008. Essential Roles of COUP-TFII in Leydig Cell Differentiation and Male Fertility. Public Library of Science One 3(9): e3285.

van den Driesche, S., Walker, M., McKinnel, C., Scott, HM., Eddie, S.L., Mitchell, R.T., Seckl, J.R., Drake, A.J., Smith, L.B., Anderson, R.A., and Sharpe, R.M. 2012. Proposed Role for COUP-TFII in Regulating Fetal Leydig Cell Steroidogenesis, Perturbation of Which Leads to Masculinization Disorders in Rodents. Public Library of Science One 7(5): e37064.

NOTE: Italics symbolize edits from John Frisch