This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Decreased, Neuronal network function in adult brain leads to Impairment, Learning and memory
Key Event Relationship Overview
AOPs Referencing Relationship
|AOP Name||Adjacency||Weight of Evidence||Quantitative Understanding||Point of Contact||Author Status||OECD Status|
|Binding of agonists to ionotropic glutamate receptors in adult brain causes excitotoxicity that mediates neuronal cell death, contributing to learning and memory impairment.||adjacent||Moderate||Low||Allie Always (send email)||Open for citation & comment||WPHA/WNT Endorsed|
Life Stage Applicability
Key Event Relationship Description
It is well established in the existing literature that NMDA receptor–dependent synaptic potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) are two forms of activity directly linked to long-term changes in synaptic efficacy and plasticity, the fundamental processes underlying learning and memory. The best characterized form of LTP occurs in the CA3-CA1 region of the hippocampus, in which LTP is initiated by transient activation of NMDARs that leads to a persistent increase in synaptic transmission through AMPA receptors (Benke et al., 1998) that can be achieved either through increasing the number of AMPA receptors at the post-synaptic surface or by increasing the single channel conductance of the receptors expressed. It has been shown that LTP in the CA1 region of the hippocampus could be accounted for by these two mechanisms (Benke et al 1998). The degree of activity of NMDARs is determined in part by extracellular Mg(2+) and by the co-agonists for this receptor, glycine and D-serine. During strong stimulation, a relief of the voltage-dependent block of NMDARs by Mg(2+) provides a positive feedback for NMDAR Ca(2+) influx into postsynaptic CA1 spines. The induction of LTP at CA3-CA1 synapses requires further signal amplification of NMDAR activity. Src family kinases (SFKs) play a "core" role in the induction of LTP by enhancing the function and expression of NMDARs. At CA3-CA1 synapses, NMDARs are largely composed of NR1 (NMDA receptor subunit 1)-NR2A or NR1-NR2B containing subunits. Recent, but controversial, evidence has correlated NR1-NR2A receptors with the induction of LTP and NR1-NR2B receptors with LTD. However, LTP can be induced by activation of either subtype of NMDAR and the ratio of NR2A:NR2B receptors has been proposed as an alternative determinant of the direction of synaptic plasticity. Many transmitters and signal pathways can modify NMDAR function and expression and, for a given stimulus strength, they can potentially lead to a change in the balance between LTP and LTD (MacDonald et al., 2006).
Mammalian learning and memory is one of the outcomes of the functional expression of neurons connected into neural networks. Neuronal damage or cell death induced by chemical compounds disrupts integration and transmission of information through neural networks thereby setting the stage for subsequent impairment of learning and memory. Exposure to chemicals that will increase the risk of functional neuronal network damage lead to learning and memory impairment.
Evidence Collection Strategy
Evidence Supporting this KER
Long-term potentiation (LTP) is a long-lasting increase in synaptic efficacy after high-frequency stimulation of afferent fibers, and its discovery potentiated the idea that individual synapses possess the properties expected for learning and memory (reviewed in Lynch et al., 2014). Moreover, LTP is intimately related to the theta rhythm, an oscillation long-associated with learning. Learning-induced enhancement in neuronal excitability, a measurement of neural network function, has also been shown in hippocampal neurons following classical conditioning in several experimental approaches (reviewed in Saar and Barkai, 2003). On the other hand, memory requires the increase in magnitude of EPSCs to be developed quickly and to be persistent for a at least a few weeks without disturbing already potentiated contacts. Once again, a substantial body of evidence have demonstrated that tight connection between LTP and diverse instances of memory exist (reviewed in Lynch et al., 2014).
The recent studies suggest that NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression of both LTD and LTP is usually accompanied by morphological changes in spines. LTD is characterized by long lasting dendritic spine shrinkage and reduced F-actin polymerization, in addition to reduced numbers of synaptic AMPA receptors. Moreover, the actin binding protein cofilin has been implicated in mediating such synaptic structural plasticity (Chen et al., 2007). If sustained, such LTD-changes in hippocampus or cortex, triggered by NMDARs overactivation could lead to synaptic dysfunction, contributing to learning and memory damage (Calabrese et al., 2014).
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
One of the most difficult issues for neuroscientists is to link neuronal network function to cognition, including learning and memory. It is still unclear exactly what modifications in neuronal circuits need to happen in order to alter motor behaviour as it is recorded in a learning and memory test (Mayford et al., 2012), meaning that there is no clear understanding about how these two KEs are connected.
It is unclear whether GLF affects only glutamatergic systems since other potential mechanisms underlying GLF neurotoxicity have not been widely investigated. Based on the existing data it is understood that exposure to GLF or NAcGLF could disrupt the neuronal network function through disruption of glutamatergic neurotransmission but further work is required to clarify molecular mechanisms that cause impairment of memory.
Known modulating factors
Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Domain of Applicability
Administration of DomA (9.0 mg DomA kg(-1) bw, i.p.) to Sparus aurata (seabream) caused neurological disturbances such as swimming in a circle, in a spiral, or upside down, that were reversed 24 hours after exposure (Nogueira et al., 2010). In rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), DomA (0.75 mg/kg bw) administration caused increased aggressive behaviour 30 min after exposure compared to controls (Bakke et al., 2010).
Bakke MJ, Hustoft HK, Horsberg TE., Subclinical effects of saxitoxin and domoic acid on aggressive behaviour and monoaminergic turnover in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat Toxicol., 2010, 99: 1-9.
Baron AW, Rushton SP, Rens N, Morris CM, Blain PG, Judge SJ., Sex differences in effects of low level domoic acid exposure. Neurotoxicology, 2013, 34: 1-8.
Benke TA1, Lüthi A, Isaac JT, Collingridge GL., Modulation of AMPA receptor unitary conductance by synaptic activity. Nature, 1998, 25: 793-7.
Calabrese B, Saffin JM, Halpain S. Activity-dependent dendritic spine shrinkage and growth involve downregulation of cofilin via distinct mechanisms. PLoS One, 2014, 16;9(4):e94787.
Calas AG, Richard O, Même S, Beloeil JC, Doan BT, Gefflaut T, Même W, Crusio WE, Pichon J, Montécot C. Chronic exposure to glufosinate-ammonium induces spatial memory impairments, hippocampal MRI modifications and glutamine synthetase activation in mice. Neurotoxicology. 2008, 29(4): 740-7
Chen LY, Rex CS, Casale MS, Gall CM, Lynch G., Changes in synaptic morphology accompany actin signaling during LTP. J Neurosci., 2007, 27: 5363–5372.
Clayton EC, Peng YG, Means LW, Ramsdell JS. Working memory deficits induced by single but not repeated exposures to domoic acid. Toxicon. 1999, 37: 1025-1039.
D'Hooge R, De Deyn PP., Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory. Brain Res Brain Res Rev., 2001, 36: 60-90.
Fuquay JM, Muha N, Pennington PL, Ramsdell JS., Domoic acid induced status epilepticus promotes aggressive behavior in rats. Physiol Behav., 2012, 105: 315-320.
Grant KS, Burbacher TM, Faustman EM, Gratttan L., Domoic acid: neurobehavioral consequences of exposure to a prevalent marine biotoxin. Neurotoxicol Teratol., 2010, 32: 132-141.
Grunwald T, Beck H, Lehnertz K, Blümcke I, Pezer N, Kurthen M, Fernández G, Van Roost D, Heinze HJ, Kutas M, Elger CE.. Evidence relating human verbal memory to hippocampal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 1999, 96: 12085-12089.
Hiolski EM, Kendrick PS, Frame ER, Myers MS, Bammler TK, Beyer RP, Farin FM, Wilkerson HW, Smith DR, Marcinek DJ, Lefebvre KA., Chronic low-level domoic acid exposure alters gene transcription and impairs mitochondrial function in the CNS. Aquat Toxicol., 2014, 155: 151-9.
Koyama K, Andou Y, Saruki K, Matsuo H., Delayed and severe toxicities of a herbicide containing glufosinate and a surfactant. Vet Hum Toxicol., 1994, 36: 17–8.
Kuhlmann AC, Guilarte TR., The peripheral benzodiazepine receptor is a sensitive indicator of domoic acid neurotoxicity. Brain Res., 1997, 751: 281-288.
Lantz SR, Mack CM, Wallace K, Key EF, Shafer TJ, Casida JE., Glufosinate binds to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and increases neuronal network activity in vitro. Neurotoxicology, 2014, 45:38-47.
Lu J, Wu DM, Zheng YL, Hu B, Cheng W, Zhang ZF., Purple sweet potato color attenuates domoic acid-induced cognitive deficits by promoting estrogen receptor-α-mediated mitochondrial biogenesis signaling in mice. Free Radic Biol Med., 2012, 52: 646-59.
Lynch G, Cox CD, Gall CM., Pharmacological enhancement of memory or cognition in normal subjects. Front Syst Neurosci., 2014, 8: 90-103.
MacDonald JF1, Jackson MF., Beazely MAHippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity and signal amplification of NMDA receptors. Crit Rev Neurobiol., 2006, 18: 71-84.
Mao Y-C, Hung D-Z, Wu M-L, Tsai W-J, Wang L-M, Ger J, et al. Acute human glufosinatecontaining herbicide poisoning. Clin Toxicol., 2012, 5: 1–7.
Mao Y-C, Wang J-D, Hung D-Z, Deng J-F, Yang C-C., Hyperammonemia following glufosinate-containing herbicide poisoning: a potential marker of severe neurotoxicity. Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2011a, 49: 48–52.
Mao Y-C, Yang C-C. Response to ‘‘Hyperammonemia following glufosinate-containing herbicide poisoning: A potential marker of severe neurotoxicity’’ by Yan-Chido Mao et al., Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2011b; 49: 48–52. Clin Toxicol 2011;49(July (6)): 513.
Mayford M, Siegelbaum SA, Kandel ER., Synapses and memory storage. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol., 2012:4(6). pii: a005751.
Meme S, Calas A-G, Monte´ cot C, Richard O, Gautier H, Gefflaut T, et al., MRI characteri- zation of structural mouse brain changes in response to chronic exposure to the glufosinate ammonium herbicide. Toxicol Sci 2009, 111: 321–30.
Matsumura N, Takeuchi C, Hishikawa K, Fujii T, Nakaki T., Glufosinate ammonium induces convulsion through N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in mice. Neurosci Lett., 2001, 304(1-2): 123-5.
Morris RG, Anderson E, Lynch GS, Baudry M.,Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-Daspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature, 1986, 319: 774-776.
Muha N, Ramsdell JS., Domoic acid induced seizures progress to a chronic state of epilepsy in rats. Toxicon., 2011, 57: 168-171.
Nakajima S, Potvin JL., Neural and behavioural effects of domoic acid, an amnesic shellfish toxin, in the rat. Can J Psychol., 1992, 46: 569-581.
Nogueira I, Lobo-da-Cunha A, Afonso A, Rivera S, Azevedo J, Monteiro R, Cervantes R, Gago-Martinez A, Vasconcelos V., Toxic effects of domoic acid in the seabream Sparus aurata. Mar Drugs, 2010, 8: 2721-232.
Ohtake T, Yasuda H, Takahashi H, Goto T, Suzuki K, Yonemura K, et al., Decreased plasma and cerebrospinal fluid glutamine concentrations in a patient with bialaphos poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol., 2001, 20: 429–34.
Park JS1, Kwak SJ, Gil HW, Kim SY, Hong SY., Glufosinate herbicide intoxication causing unconsciousness, convulsion, and 6th cranial nerve palsy. J Korean Med Sci., 2013, 28:1687-9.
Park HY, Lee PH, Shin DH, Kim GW., Anterograde amnesia with hippocampal lesions following glufosinate intoxication. Neurology, 2006, 67:914–5.
Petrie BF, Pinsky C, Standish NM, Bose R, Glavin GB., Parenteral domoic acid impairs spatial learning in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Beh., 1992, 41: 211-214.
Pulido OM., Domoic acid toxicologic pathway: a review. Mar Drugs, 2008, 6:180-219.
Saar D, Barkai E. (2003) Long-term modifications in intrinsic neuronal properties and rule learning in rats. Eur J Neurosci. 17: 2727-2734.
Sobotka TJ, Brown R, Quander DY, Jackson R, Smith M, Long SA, Barton CN, Rountree RL, Hall S, Eilers P, Johannessen JN, Scallet AC., Domoic acid: neurobehavioral and neurohistological effects of low-dose exposure in adult rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol., 1996, 18: 659-670.
Tryphonas L, Truelove J, Nera E, Iverson F., Acute neurotoxicity of domoic acid in the rat. Toxicol Pathol., 1990, 18: 1-9.
Watanabe T, Sano T., Neurological effects of glufosinate poisoning with a brief review. Hum Exp Toxicol., 1998, 17(1): 35-9.
Wu DM, Lu J, Zheng YL, Zhang YQ, Hu B, Cheng W, Zhang ZF, Li MQ., Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of protein kinase C zeta attenuates domoic acid-induced cognitive deficits in mice. Toxicol Sci., 2012, 128: 209-222.
Wu DM, Lu J, Zhang YQ, Zheng YL, Hu B, Cheng W, Zhang ZF, Li MQ., Ursolic acid improves domoic acid-induced cognitive deficits in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol., 2013, 271: 27-36.
Retrieved from https://aopkb.org/aopwiki/index.php/?oldid=23557