This Event is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Key Event: 2235
Key Event Title
Inhibition of E4 (Uracil-DNA Glycosylase)
Short name
Biological Context
| Level of Biological Organization |
|---|
| Molecular |
Cell term
| Cell term |
|---|
| cell |
Organ term
| Organ term |
|---|
| organ |
Event Components
Key Event Overview
AOPs Including This Key Event
| AOP Name | Role of event in AOP | Point of Contact | Author Status | OECD Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C6R-Derived Protein K7 following Monkeypox infection leads to heart failure | KeyEvent | Arthur Author (send email) | Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite |
Taxonomic Applicability
Life Stages
| Life stage | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Embryo | High |
| Juvenile | Moderate |
| Adult, reproductively mature | Moderate |
Sex Applicability
| Term | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Mixed | Moderate |
Key Event Description
The inhibition of E4 (Uracil-DNA Glycosylase, UDG) is useful in understanding the changes between DNA damage and repair processes. By being able to block activity through UDG, the persistence of uracil in DNA can lead to mutagenesis and genomic instability. Moreover, the inhibition of UDG shows the mechanisms that different cells will employ once a primary repair pathway is compromised. Unique DNA repair pathways which include mismatch repair (MMR) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) will be useful to understand how cells will react under stress condition.
Viruses are able to encode their own UDG which reveals that the pathogens manipulate host repair mechanisms to their advantage. By understanding this interaction, the development of antiviral drugs that specifically target viral UDG can be synthesized and inhibit harmful viral replication which will reduce pathogenicity. Overall, the inhibition of UDG is extremely useful in providing insights into fundamental processes of DNA maintenance, cellular responses to genetic damage, and potential therapeutic interventions for various diseases.
How It Is Measured or Detected
The inhibition of uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) is measured based on how inhibitors affect the enzyme's activity and function. UDG's ability to separate uracil from DNA substrates is quantifized through the use of enzyme activity assays. By targeting uracil, the formation of abasic sites is measured for changes. (Mandi et al., 2022). Inhibition assays are able to measure the effectiveness of the pre-chosen target inhibitors by pre-incubating UDG with the compound and assessing residual enzyme activity. (Nguyen et al., 2021). By testing UDG inhibitors in living cells to determine the impact on DNA repair processes, it will be able to provide a better understanding for how the inhibitors can be affected.
Domain of Applicability
Taxonomic:
In Arabidopsis thaliana, UDG is used similarly to other organisms by utilizing the base excision repair pathway. This pathway is important in being able to have genomic stability by removing uracil residues from DNA. This can occur when there is a deamination of cytosine during DNA replication. (Lindahl, 1993). Because the activity of UDG can prevent mutations, it has the ability to also disrupt plant growth when it is placed under stressful environmental conditions. (Bones, 1993). The UDG in Arabidopsis also affects the plants immune system by changing the integrity of DNA repair pathways. (Yu et al., 2013). By maintaining and modulating both the genomic stability and the consequent stress responses, its importantance in plant biology is extremely useful.
Mouse models such as the mus musculus have demonstrated that UDG plays an important role in DNA repair while also having an impact on cellular physiology. For instance, UDG-deficient mice show an increased chance to have mutations and genomic instability. This proves the essential role of UDG in maintaining genetic integrity. (Lucas-Lledó et al., 2011).
In drosophila melanogaster, UDG is encoded by the dUNG gene and it is able to function very similarly to UDG in other organisms. In terms of functionality, it uses base excision repair (BER) pathway and is important in maintaining genomic stability. Also, the importance of UDG in DNA repair and its impact on developmental processes and stress responses remains at the forefront of research studies. Changes in UDG lead to increased mutation rates and genomic instability which can affect fly physiology. (Muha et al., 2012).
for homo sapiens, UDG is encoded by the UNG gene and plays an impactful role on DNA repair and immune system function which includes the somatic hypermutation during antibody diversification (Nguyen et al., 2021). The role to reduce mutation accumulation is able to host DNA repair pathways which allows for UDG to become a potential therapeutic target. (Chakraborty et al., 2021). By Understanding the function of UDG in humans, it will provides useful information pertaining to the conservation of DNA repair and disease prevention across different species.
Life stage:
Because applications of the inhibition of UDG typically occurs during the at any stage of the viral replication cycle, it is quite common for it to provide the role of DNA repair as well as maintaining genomic stability. By deliberately blocking UDG at certain life stages, the isolation of UDG will allow for the measurement of DNA damage in its absence. This will contribute insight to the overall cellular responses. (Xu et al., 2008).
Sex:
The KE is plausibly applicable to both sexes. The inhibition of UDG is not sex dependent because it is essential to DNA repair. This process will decrease the amount of mutation and allow for the proper DNA repair functions to occur. (Petterson et al., 2011).
References
Bones, A. M. (1993). Expression and occurrence of uracil-DNA glycosylase in higher plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 88(4), 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1399-3054.1993.TB01389.X
Lindahl, T. (1993). Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 1993 362:6422, 362(6422), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1038/362709a0
Lucas-Lledó, J. I., Maddamsetti, R., & Lynch, M. (2011). Phylogenomic Analysis of the Uracil-DNA Glycosylase Superfamily. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28(3), 1307. https://doi.org/10.1093/MOLBEV/MSQ318
Mandi, C. S., Mahata, T., Patra, D., Chakraborty, J., Bora, A., Pal, R., & Dutta, S. (2022). Cleavage of Abasic Sites in DNA by an Aminoquinoxaline Compound: Augmented Cytotoxicity and DNA Damage in Combination with an Anticancer Drug Chlorambucil in Human Colorectal Carcinoma Cells. ACS Omega, 7(8), 6488–6501. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSOMEGA.1C04962/SUPPL_FILE/AO1C04962_SI_001.PDF
Muha, V., Horváth, A., Békési, A., Pukáncsik, M., Hodoscsek, B., Merényi, G., Róna, G., Batki, J., Kiss, I., Jankovics, F., Vilmos, P., Erdélyi, M., & Vértessy, B. G. (2012). Uracil-Containing DNA in Drosophila: Stability, Stage-Specific Accumulation, and Developmental Involvement. PLOS Genetics, 8(6), e1002738. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1002738
Nguyen, M. T., Moiani, D., Ahmed, Z., Arvai, A. S., Namjoshi, S., Shin, D. S., Fedorov, Y., Selvik, E. J., Jones, D. E., Pink, J., Yan, Y., Laverty, D. J., Nagel, Z. D., Tainer, J. A., & Gerson, S. L. (2021). An effective human uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor targets the open pre-catalytic active site conformation. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 163, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PBIOMOLBIO.2021.02.004
Pettersen, H. S., Visnes, T., Vågbø, C. B., Svaasand, E. K., Doseth, B., Slupphaug, G., Kavli, B., & Krokan, H. E. (2011). UNG-initiated base excision repair is the major repair route for 5-fluorouracil in DNA, but 5-fluorouracil cytotoxicity depends mainly on RNA incorporation. Nucleic Acids Research, 39(19), 8430. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKR563
Xu, G., Herzig, M., Rotrekl, V., & Walter, C. A. (2008). Base Excision Repair, Aging and Health Span. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 129(7–8), 366. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MAD.2008.03.001
Yu, A., Lepère, G., Jay, F., Wang, J., Bapaume, L., Wang, Y., Abraham, A. L., Penterman, J., Fischer, R. L., Voinnet, O., & Navarro, L. (2013). Dynamics and biological relevance of DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis antibacterial defense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(6), 2389–2394. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1211757110/SUPPL_FILE/SD03.XLS